Operational Compliance hub

Beyond the Black Box:
Mathematical Proof of Compliance.

Geodesia transforms AI auditing from a manual, error-prone checklist into a deterministic technical runtime. Powered by G-1 Symbiont, our platform ensures that every AI output is compliant, explainable, and audit-ready.

🔍

Deterministic Traceability

Reconstruct the exact internal path of a token from prompt to output. No more guessing why the model behaved a certain way.

🧬

Causal Accountability

Powered by the Neural Symbolic Potential (NSP) observer on Riemannian Manifold, identify the specific input fragments that mathematically support every model claim.

🔐

Cryptographic Proof

Every inference and human review is recorded in a tamper-proof HMAC-SHA256 hash chain—a "Blockchain of Auditing."

EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689)

Mapping technical Geodesia capabilities to the requirements for High-Risk and General-Purpose AI (GPAI).

Article 11

Technical Documentation

Providers must draw up detailed technical documentation demonstrating compliance before placing systems on the market.

Solution: The Institutional Reporting Engine automates the assembly of the Annex IV Technical Documentation Scaffold, extracting model architecture and configuration directly from the runtime state.
Official Article 11 Link
Article 12

Record-Keeping (Logging)

Mandatory automatic recording of events (logs) over the system's lifetime to ensure traceability relevant to identifying risks.

Solution: Our Immutable Governance Ledger handles sub-second precision recording of every call. Cryptographic chaining ensures non-repudiation of the audit trail.
Official Article 12 Link
Article 13

Transparency to Deployers

Systems must ensure operation is transparent enough to enable deployers to interpret outputs and accompagnied by clear instructions.

Solution: The Transparency Manual Generator creates high-quality Deployer Transparency Manuals disclosing active thresholds and behavioral limitations. Official Article 13 Link
Article 14

Human Oversight

Design must allow effective oversight by natural persons to prevent risks and mitigate automation bias.

Solution: A 3-level oversight chain (Operator to AI Responsible) where reviewers are provided with the Causal Graph behind every flagged decision.
Official Article 14 Link
Article 50

Transparency for Generative AI

AI-generated content must be marked in a machine-readable format and detectable as such.

Solution: The Latent Content Watermarking service provides Manifest Disclosure (visible multi-language labels) and Latent Disclosure (cryptographic HMAC-SHA256). Official Article 50 Link
Article 86

Right to Explanation

Affected persons have the right to receive a clear and meaningful explanation for high-risk decisions.

Solution: The Explanation Export Module uses causal attribution to identify the exact "support-token evidence" for the specific AI output. Official Article 86 Link

Additional EU AI Act Coverage

Article 15: Accuracy & Cyber robustness managed via real-time logit analysis and our Hallucination Stabilization Engine.
Article 16: Automated Checklist for Provider Obligations including conformity declarations and QMS.
Article 18: 10-year retention policy for technical documentation enforced by the Data Retention Manager.

Multi-Jurisdictional Alignment

Italy Law 132/2025

Anthropocentric Governance

Geodesia enforces Level-3 review notifications to the ACN within the mandated 72-hour window, ensuring the AI remains a recommender and human oversight is recorded in our deterministic ledger.

California SB 942

AI Transparency & Control

Our Security Kill-Switch Protocol ensures sub-72h compliance with state-wide suspension mandates. Public watermark verification is fully enabled via the secure Verification Endpoint.

Canada AIDA

Harm Mitigation Reporting

Mapping safety scores to specific psychological and economic harm categories, while auto-generating plain-language manuals for public accessibility.

UK DUAA 2025

The Right to Contest

Tracking contested decisions through our oversight module, providing a legally clear path for human intervention in automated decision-making.

Brazil PL 2338

Civil Liability & Rights

Aligning with the Brazilian AI Framework by categorizing models into risk tiers and ensuring that users' rights to non-discrimination are technically enforced.

China GB/T 45654

Generative AI Security

Supporting technical requirements for generative AI service security, including specific content filtering and mandatory provenance record-keeping.

Global Standards

Technical Standard Mapping

ISO/IEC 42001 (AIMS)

Geodesia automates Control A.10 (System Evaluation). Our Audit Pack serves as primary evidence for Clause 8 (Operation) and Clause 9 (Performance Evaluation).

NIST AI RMF 1.0

  • GOVERN: Automated via oversight chains.
  • MAP: Automated via Deployer Config.
  • MEASURE: Real-time hallucination/safety scores.
  • MANAGE: Proactive kill-switch activation.

NIS2 Directive

Ensuring supply chain security of AI assets and mandatory incident reporting (72h) via automated ACN alerts.

MiFID II

Record-keeping for financial advisory agents, ensuring full traceability of automated advisory data points.

HIPAA

Protecting PHI through localized runtime deployment and strictly enforced sub-processor auditing.

From Inference to Audit Bundle

This pipeline is the operational implementation of our MuPAX-based Architecture.

01

Pre-Inference Governance

The system performs a "Pre-Flight Check": Querying the Kill-Switch status and verifying Provider Identity. If a regulatory suspension is active, the call is blocked within 100ms.

02

Evaluation & Manifold Observation

As the model generates, GLAD Manifold calculates raw logs for safety and hallucination. These aren't just scores; they are Compliance Signals recorded in real-time.

03

Post-Inference Enrichment

The Neural Symbolic Potential observer identifies causal parts of input, watermarks are injected, and the payload hash is chained to the append_only_log. Retention policies are applied automatically.

04

Oversight Escalation

If thresholds are breached, human review tasks are created. The system records natural persons involved and notifies the responsible officer for high-res review.

05

Audit Bundle Export

The compliance officer generates the Audit Pack: Annex IV documents, FRIA bundles, and a cryptographically signed JSON trail proving 100% compliance over time.

Auditeur's Glossary

Annex IV Technical Documentation
Detailed design and operational records required for High-Risk AI systems under the EU AI Act. Generated by Geodesia's Audit Pack.
Append-Only Log (AOL)
A cryptographic ledger where every record is hashed and chained to the previous one, ensuring non-repudiation and integrity.
Causal Attribution
The process of identifying specific input data mathematically supporting an output. Implemented via the Neural Symbolic Potential (NSP) observer on Riemannian Manifold.
Grounding Support
A metric representing the degree to which a model's claim is objectively supported by the provided context or reference database.
Latent Watermark
A hidden HMAC-SHA256 signature embedded in AI-generated text to prove origin without altering readability.
Retention Tier
Classification determining legal storage duration, from 6 months for inference logs to 10 years for technical documentation.

Audit-Ready at the Push of a Button.

Experience the world's most advanced AI compliance platform. Deploy G-1 on your infrastructure and move from intent to evidence.

Book a Technical Audit Talk to Compliance Experts